Answers cited to the page, documents drafted on the deadline, every status check on record.
You don't pay a dollar until it's built and working.
All discovery is free. Each piece is billed only once it is running in your business.
ThirdAxis builds AI software for law firms and legal teams, inside the systems they already run. A knowledge hub that answers from your own documents with a citation on every claim. A document desk that merges case data into notices and filings as critical dates come due. Bankruptcy checks that run on their own, SCRA files prepared for a person to upload to DMDC, and an audit log of both. And an intake agent that gathers the facts and hands every inquiry to the right person. The firm owns all of it.
How much notice does the client need to give to terminate the MSA for convenience, and when is the earliest it can end?
Section 14.2 of the MSA allows termination for convenience on 90 days’ written notice1. Amendment No. 2 shortened that to 60 days for notices sent after July 1, 20262.
The client sent written notice on September 12, 2026, by email and overnight courier, which satisfies the notice clause in Section 21.431. On those terms the earliest termination date is November 11, 2026.
Whether the termination fee in Schedule C still applies. Schedule C is not in the matter file, so the hub did not guess.
3. Termination for Convenience.
Section 14.2 of the Agreement is amended by deleting “ninety (90) days” and replacing it with “sixty (60) days”, effective for any notice delivered on or after July 1, 2026. All other terms of Section 14 remain in full force.
Every citation opens the page it came from. An attorney reads the source before relying on the answer.
Concept. A question about a client’s contract answered from the matter file, each statement cited to its page, and the one question the documents do not cover left unanswered.
Where a legal team’s day goes.
Finding the right document, retyping the same facts into the next notice, and checking the same databases by hand. The work is necessary and it is rarely billable. The figures below are industry-wide.
The average lawyer bills about three hours of an 8-hour day. Much of the rest goes to finding documents, checking status, and administrative work.
of answers from leading commercial legal research AI tools contained false or misgrounded statements in independent testing. Citations a person can check are the safeguard.
is the time legal professionals expect AI to free up in the near term, by their own estimate in a large industry survey.
In legal work an answer is only useful if someone can check where it came from.
The systems we build for legal teams.
The knowledge hub is above. The next three take the repeat work off the paralegals and the intake line: documents on deadline, status checks on a schedule, and the first conversation with a new client.
Documents merged from case data, driven by critical dates.
Your templates pull live fields from case management, the calendar, and the witness and vendor lists, so notices, letters, and filings are drafted without copy and paste, one at a time or by the hundred. The critical dates on each matter decide what is drafted next, and anything a template cannot fill is flagged for a person.
In the Circuit Court of Cook County
Daniel Reyes, Plaintiff, v. Brightline Logistics, Inc., Defendant. Case No. 2026 L 004418
Please take notice that Plaintiff will take the deposition of the plant manager of the Elk Grove facility on October 28, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.
- Caption
- Case management
- Case number
- Case management
- Deponent and title
- Witness list
- Date, time, place
- Firm calendar
- Court reporter
- Vendor list
Held for attorney review. Nothing is filed or served until an attorney signs off.
Bankruptcy and SCRA status checks, with an audit log.
Every individual on an open matter is checked against PACER on a schedule, and again before any filing. SCRA files are prepared for the Defense Manpower Data Center, a person uploads each one, and results are matched back. A new bankruptcy case or active duty status pauses the matter and goes to the supervising attorney. Best-address lookups run alongside, and every check is saved with its date and source.
Holds and pauses go to a person. The system flags and records; an attorney decides what happens next.
Intake and triage on the website and after hours.
An intake agent on your website, intranet, or client portal gathers the facts your intake form asks for, runs the parties against conflicts, and writes a structured intake into case management. It does not give legal advice. Every inquiry goes to a named role with a summary and the full conversation attached, and every conversation is reviewed for scope.
- Matter type
- Wage claim, unpaid wages
- Opposing party
- Northshore Fabrication
- Amount
- About $3,200
- Location
- Waukegan, IL
- Callback
- Mornings
And more we build for firms.
Contract review against your playbook
Incoming contracts compared with the firm's own positions and fallback language, with each deviation cited to the clause and a redline drafted for the attorney.
Deposition and discovery summaries
Transcripts and productions summarized by issue and witness, with every point cited to the page and line it came from.
Time entries drafted from the day's work
Emails, documents, and calendar events turned into draft time entries in the firm's narrative style, for the attorney to approve before anything is billed.
Review of every public conversation
Each intake and website conversation checked for anything that reads as legal advice, out-of-scope answers, or bias, with flags for a person to review the same day.
Knowledge hubs where people already work
Practice guides, manuals, and policies organized by office, practice area, or topic, and embedded in SharePoint, the intranet, or a client portal with role-based access.
Practice and matter reporting
Questions about caseloads, deadlines, realization, and aging asked in plain language and answered from the case management data, with the query shown.
Two years and more than 20 AI projects for law firms and legal aid organizations.
Our lead engineer has spent the past two years as the lead AI platform engineer at a managed service provider for law firms and legal aid organizations, and has delivered more than 20 AI projects there. Dozens of organizations use software he has built, including work with the states of New York, California, and Wisconsin.
The status checks, document generation, knowledge hubs, and intake agents on this page are the same kinds of systems, already in production. We know what a legal team needs before anything touches its data: confidentiality, matter-level permissions, and an audit trail that holds up.
Some of this already exists. We would not rebuild it.
Your case management system keeps the matters, your document system keeps the files, and the research platforms cover the law. What sits between them today is your team, searching and retyping. That is the part we build.
How we work with a firm.
Answers come only from your documents.
Every statement is cited to the document and page it came from. When the documents do not cover a question, the system says so instead of filling the gap. Ethical walls and matter permissions apply to every search.
Privilege and confidentiality first.
Client data stays in your environment or a dedicated one under your accounts, encrypted, logged, and never used to train a model. Access follows the permissions you already manage.
An attorney stays in the loop.
Nothing is filed, served, sent to a client, or offered as advice without an attorney's review. The systems draft, check, and record. People decide.
- Cited to the page
- Ethical walls respected
- An attorney approves
- You own the code
The screens on this page are concepts, not finished software. The matters, parties, people, case numbers, dates, documents, and amounts shown in them are illustrative and describe no real firm, client, or case. Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, Filevine, LegalServer, NetDocuments, iManage, SharePoint, Westlaw, and Lexis are named only to describe systems we connect to; ThirdAxis is not affiliated with them. Industry figures are from the Clio Legal Trends Report (utilization), the Stanford RegLab and Institute for Human-Centered AI study of legal research AI tools (hallucination rates), and the Thomson Reuters Future of Professionals report (time saved). The two wide photos are generated images. Nothing here has been scoped or priced; that is what a first call is for.
Bring us one matter type. See it on your own documents.
A short call about where your team’s time goes and what your case management system allows, and which system to start with. Reach Roman directly at roman@thirdaxis.ai.